ealmeida
658b2a5136
Normalizacao OKF dos .md: type/title/description/timestamp/layer + descriptions factuais (rich abstracts). Apenas .md tracked; corpos intactos. Parte da aplicacao OKF a /Dados/Dev (28-06-2026). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
4.7 KiB
type, title, description, timestamp, layer
| type | title | description | timestamp | layer |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Document | Research | Feature: Care API - Sistema de gestão de cuidados de saúde | 2025-09-11T23:17:22.589413+00:00 | wiki |
Phase 0 Research: Care API System
Feature: Care API - Sistema de gestão de cuidados de saúde
Date: 2025-09-12
Status: Complete
Research Summary
All technical requirements have been clearly specified in the detailed KiviCare integration specifications provided. No unknowns remain from the Technical Context analysis.
WordPress REST API Framework
Decision: WordPress REST API with custom endpoints via register_rest_route() Rationale:
- Native WordPress integration ensuring compatibility
- Built-in authentication and permission handling
- Standardized HTTP methods and response formats
- Existing KiviCare plugin integration points
Alternatives considered:
- Custom API framework: Rejected due to WordPress ecosystem requirements
- GraphQL implementation: Rejected due to REST API simplicity and WordPress standards
JWT Authentication for WordPress
Decision: WordPress JWT Authentication plugin with custom role-based permissions Rationale:
- Stateless authentication suitable for API consumption
- Integrates with existing WordPress user system (wp_users)
- Supports custom role definitions (administrator, doctor, patient, receptionist)
- Token-based security for mobile/web app integration
Alternatives considered:
- WordPress cookies: Rejected due to cross-origin limitations
- OAuth2: Over-engineered for single-plugin use case
KiviCare Database Integration
Decision: Direct WordPress $wpdb queries with prepared statements Rationale:
- Preserves existing KiviCare 35-table schema integrity
- No additional ORM layer needed - WordPress provides secure database access
- Maintains compatibility with existing KiviCare plugin operations
- Performance optimized for medical data relationships
Alternatives considered:
- WordPress ORM plugins: Unnecessary complexity for established schema
- Custom database layer: Would duplicate WordPress security features
Testing Framework
Decision: PHPUnit with WordPress testing framework (WP_UnitTestCase) Rationale:
- Standard WordPress plugin testing approach
- Provides database setup/teardown for integration tests
- Mocks WordPress environment for isolated testing
- Compatible with continuous integration workflows
Alternatives considered:
- Standalone PHPUnit: Insufficient WordPress integration
- Custom testing framework: Reinventing established tools
API Response Format
Decision: JSON responses following WordPress REST API standards Rationale:
- Consistent with WordPress ecosystem expectations
- Standardized error codes and response structures
- Built-in CORS handling for cross-origin requests
- Cacheable response formats
Alternatives considered:
- XML responses: Outdated for modern applications
- Custom formats: Would break client expectation standards
Performance and Caching
Decision: WordPress Object Cache with Transients API Rationale:
- Built-in WordPress caching mechanism
- Configurable TTL for different data types
- Compatible with Redis/Memcached backends
- Automatic cache invalidation on data updates
Alternatives considered:
- Database-level caching: Limited control over cache invalidation
- External caching services: Additional infrastructure complexity
Plugin Architecture
Decision: WordPress plugin with modular endpoint classes Rationale:
- Clear separation of concerns (endpoints, models, utilities)
- Easy testing of individual components
- Follows WordPress plugin development best practices
- Maintainable codebase structure
Alternatives considered:
- Monolithic plugin file: Poor maintainability and testing
- Multiple plugins: Unnecessary complexity for single API system
Error Handling and Logging
Decision: WordPress WP_Error with structured logging to debug.log Rationale:
- Standard WordPress error handling mechanism
- Structured logging for operational monitoring
- Integration with existing WordPress debugging tools
- Configurable log levels for production/development
Alternatives considered:
- Custom exception handling: Would bypass WordPress standards
- External logging services: Additional infrastructure dependency
Research Validation
✅ All technical decisions align with:
- WordPress development best practices
- Healthcare data security requirements
- KiviCare plugin compatibility
- Performance and scalability goals
- Testing and observability standards
✅ No remaining NEEDS CLARIFICATION items ✅ All dependencies verified as available and compatible ✅ Integration patterns established and documented
Phase 0 Complete: Ready for Phase 1 Design & Contracts