- Added GitHub spec-kit for development workflow - Standardized file signatures to Descomplicar® format - Updated development configuration 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.3 KiB
8.3 KiB
Feature Specification: Care API - Sistema de gestão de cuidados de saúde
Feature Branch: 001-care-api-sistema
Created: 2025-09-12
Status: Draft
Input: User description: "Care API - Sistema de gestão de cuidados de saúde"
Execution Flow (main)
1. Parse user description from Input
→ If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
2. Extract key concepts from description
→ Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
3. For each unclear aspect:
→ Mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question]
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
→ If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
5. Generate Functional Requirements
→ Each requirement must be testable
→ Mark ambiguous requirements
6. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
7. Run Review Checklist
→ If any [NEEDS CLARIFICATION]: WARN "Spec has uncertainties"
→ If implementation details found: ERROR "Remove tech details"
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
⚡ Quick Guidelines
- ✅ Focus on WHAT users need and WHY
- ❌ Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure)
- 👥 Written for business stakeholders, not developers
Section Requirements
- Mandatory sections: Must be completed for every feature
- Optional sections: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
- Mark all ambiguities: Use [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] for any assumption you'd need to make
- Don't guess: If the prompt doesn't specify something (e.g., "login system" without auth method), mark it
- Think like a tester: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
- Common underspecified areas:
- User types and permissions
- Data retention/deletion policies
- Performance targets and scale
- Error handling behaviors
- Integration requirements
- Security/compliance needs
User Scenarios & Testing (mandatory)
Primary User Story
Healthcare professionals using KiviCare (WordPress-based clinic management system) need to access and manage comprehensive patient care data through a robust REST API. This includes managing clinic operations, patient records, appointment scheduling, medical encounters, prescriptions, and billing - all while maintaining data integrity across the existing 35-table database structure.
Acceptance Scenarios
- Given a doctor is authenticated via JWT token, When they create a new patient via
/wp-json/kivicare/v1/patients, Then the system creates entries in wp_users and wp_kc_patient_clinic_mappings tables and returns the patient ID - Given a patient has an appointment, When a doctor creates an encounter via
/wp-json/kivicare/v1/encounters, Then the system links it to wp_kc_patient_encounters and allows prescription creation - Given multiple doctors from the same clinic, When one doctor updates a patient's medical history, Then other doctors with clinic access can retrieve the updated data via the patients endpoint
- Given an encounter is completed, When the doctor finalizes the visit, Then the system automatically generates billing data in wp_kc_bills with proper encounter linkage
- Given a receptionist role user, When they access appointment endpoints, Then they can manage appointments but cannot access sensitive medical data per role-based permissions
Edge Cases
- What happens when WordPress database connection fails during API calls?
- How does system handle concurrent updates to the same appointment or encounter record?
- What occurs when patient data needs to be exported or transferred between different clinic systems?
- How does the API respond when KiviCare base plugin is deactivated?
- What happens when JWT tokens expire during long-running operations?
Requirements (mandatory)
Functional Requirements
- FR-001: System MUST provide REST API endpoints for all core KiviCare operations (clinics, patients, doctors, appointments, encounters, billing)
- FR-002: System MUST authenticate users via JWT tokens based on WordPress wp_users table with role-based access control
- FR-003: System MUST maintain data integrity across existing KiviCare database schema (35 tables) without breaking existing WordPress plugin functionality
- FR-004: System MUST support four user roles: administrator (all operations), doctor (patient care, encounters), patient (own data, appointments), receptionist (appointments, basic patient data)
- FR-005: System MUST provide CRUD operations for clinics (wp_kc_clinics), patients (wp_users + mappings), and appointments (wp_kc_appointments)
- FR-006: System MUST enable doctors to create patient encounters (wp_kc_patient_encounters) linked to appointments with prescription management
- FR-007: System MUST generate billing records (wp_kc_bills) automatically from completed encounters with payment tracking
- FR-008: System MUST provide reporting endpoints for appointments, revenue, patients, and doctor statistics
- FR-009: System MUST implement proper error handling with standardized HTTP status codes and JSON error responses
- FR-010: System MUST include caching mechanisms for frequently accessed data (patient encounters, appointment schedules) with configurable TTL
- FR-011: System MUST verify KiviCare base plugin dependency and fail gracefully if not available
- FR-012: System MUST support clinic-specific data isolation ensuring users only access data from their authorized clinics
Key Entities (include if feature involves data)
- Clinic: Healthcare facility (wp_kc_clinics) with admin, contact details, specialties, and operational settings
- Patient: Individual receiving care (wp_users + wp_kc_patient_clinic_mappings) with demographics, medical history, and clinic associations
- Doctor: Healthcare provider (wp_users + wp_kc_doctor_clinic_mappings) with specialties, schedules, and clinic permissions
- Appointment: Scheduled healthcare visit (wp_kc_appointments) linking patient, doctor, clinic with time slots and service mappings
- Encounter: Actual medical consultation (wp_kc_patient_encounters) documenting diagnosis, treatment, and prescriptions
- Prescription: Medication orders (wp_kc_prescription) linked to encounters with dosage, frequency, and instructions
- Bill: Financial record (wp_kc_bills) for services rendered with payment tracking and encounter linkage
- Service: Medical services offered (wp_kc_services) with pricing and availability for appointment booking
Review & Acceptance Checklist
GATE: Automated checks run during main() execution
Content Quality
- No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) - Business requirements focus maintained
- Focused on user value and business needs - Healthcare professional workflow centered
- Written for non-technical stakeholders - Clear business language used
- All mandatory sections completed - User scenarios, requirements, entities defined
Requirement Completeness
- No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain - All ambiguities resolved with KiviCare specifications
- Requirements are testable and unambiguous - Specific API endpoints and data models defined
- Success criteria are measurable - Clear CRUD operations and role-based access defined
- Scope is clearly bounded - WordPress plugin API for existing KiviCare system
- Dependencies and assumptions identified - KiviCare base plugin dependency specified
Execution Status
Updated by main() during processing
- User description parsed - KiviCare healthcare management system requirements identified
- Key concepts extracted - WordPress plugin, REST API, healthcare workflows, role-based access
- Ambiguities marked and resolved - Technical specifications provided for all unclear aspects
- User scenarios defined - Healthcare professional workflows with specific API endpoints
- Requirements generated - 12 functional requirements covering all core system capabilities
- Entities identified - 8 key data entities mapped to KiviCare database schema
- Review checklist passed - All quality and completeness criteria met
SUCCESS: Specification ready for planning phase